Intake before code
01Ask
02Clarify
03Plan
Natural language intake
Describe like a colleague. Intent is captured before scaffolding.
Clarifying questions required before build
For founders and PMs
Turn a plain-English idea into a working app
Plan, tests, preview, and cost stay in one workspace.
The category
Chat tools leave you with a scroll of prompts. Arvad keeps the plan, tests, and deploy record in one workspace you can share with stakeholders.
Plan, checks, preview, and cost in one shareable link
Clarifying questions run before the first build
Share view cites files, suite status, and change scope
Deploy record stays linked to the original description
01
The hard part starts after the model finishes
You lose the plan the moment generation starts. Chat scrollback cannot answer what shipped, why, or what it cost.
- Prompts evaporate when the session ends
- PRDs drift from the build within hours
- Stakeholders need cited files, not screenshots
- No shareable proof without digging through chat
Describe sits at the front of the build
01Describe
02Plan
03Build
04Deploy
From description to a live preview
Four moves in one workspace: plain English to a preview URL stakeholders can open without a slide deck.
Four moves in one workspace: plain English to a preview URL stakeholders can open without a slide deck.
01Describe your app
02Lock the plan
03Build with tests
04Deploy and iterate
Describe your app
Plain English, docs, or links. Clarifying questions close gaps before any code generates.
Clarifying questions run before the first build
Lock the plan
PRD and architecture land in the workspace and sync for review before the build commits to a direction.
Plan is versioned with the project, not a side doc
Evidence for this run
Checks
- Unit suite
- Integration
- Deploy health
Cited files
- app/api/checkout.ts
- lib/billing/invoice.py
- tests/checkout.spec.ts
Blast radius
3 services · 11 files · 0 shared schemas
Checks green. Staging URL live. Spend recorded on the same thread.
Build with tests
Code with coverage on the same run. Checks and cited files appear in the share view.
Checks and cited files appear in the share view
Why describe-and-build holds up
Concrete mechanisms.
Intelligent clarification
Gaps get filled before a line of code ships.
Build waits until open questions close
Docs in the workspace
PRDs and designs stay attached to the run.
Doc edits feed the next build
Decomposed delivery
Milestones and tasks mapped with dependencies.
Work breakdown stored with the project
Production-shaped code
Architecture patterns applied during build.
Cited files listed in the share view
Tests with the change
Coverage travels with the same run.
Suite status visible before you share the link
Deploy in the same workspace
CI and hosting without a second tool hop.
Preview URL written back to the project
Iterate without amnesia
Change the ask. Prior decisions stay visible.
History lives in the project, not chat scrollback
03
A full-width look at the run
Product UI first. The shareable artifact is the run link, not a deck rebuilt from memory.
- Share view is what the client sees
- Plan, preview, cost, and checks in one URL
- Doc sync keeps the plan attached to each build
- Change scope visible before you share
Evidence for this run
Checks
- Unit suite
- Integration
- Deploy health
Cited files
- app/api/checkout.ts
- lib/billing/invoice.py
- tests/checkout.spec.ts
Blast radius
3 services · 11 files · 0 shared schemas
Share this run. No slide deck required.
Share one link
Plan, preview, cost, and checks in a single URL.
Share view is the artifact you forward
Chat tools vs one workspace
Same starting sentence. Different ending artifact.
Chat codingArvad
Arvad sits where the thread keeps the plan, staging, spend, and checks.
| Capability | Chat coding | Arvad |
|---|---|---|
| System of record | Scrollback | Project workspace |
| Plan after build | ||
| Tests + cited files | Optional | On the share link |
| Staging + spend | Elsewhere | Same link |
| Shareable proof |
Plans for you and your team
Solo or team. Upgrade when usage grows.
Save 20% on Team.
Compare plansPick the plan that matches how you build. | FreeStart free | StarterChoose plan | ProfessionalChoose plan | EnterpriseChoose plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credits included | 120 credits included | 240 credits Included | 500 credits Included | |
| Projects per week | 1 mini project | 2 mini projects | 4 mini + 2 medium projects | |
| Documentation access | Essential | Standard | Full | |
| Planning & task breakdown | ||||
| Dependency resolution | ||||
| Queue-based processing | ||||
| Daily questions | Limited | Up to 10 / per day | Up to 25 / per day | |
| Upgrade options | ---- | Large projects | Large-scale projects | |
| Price | $0.0 | $25 | $50 |
Straight answers
Limits stated plainly. No demo theater.
One question
When the build finishes, can you show a teammate the plan, preview, tests, and deploy status without digging through chat?
If you cannot, you still have a chat log. Arvad keeps that work in one workspace.
Describe the app. Keep the record.
One workspace from sentence to preview.
Keep exploring